In response to Dave Skinner’s essay, I must
confess to being what he calls a “greenie” (HCN, 5/10/04: Motorized
recreation belongs in the backcountry). But I implore you, Dave,
don’t give up all that quickly. You might have allies you
have not counted on.
First, however, allow me to
establish that in western Nevada where I live, motorized recreation
enthusiasts are oftentimes a cut below the “don’t be stupid”
advocates you describe. They pursue their arcane “sport” with
disregard for the fragile desert ecosystem and for anyone else who
might value it. Each outing (I do mine on foot) I find new country
they have invaded and digested. Tired of last week’s trails,
they turn this weekend to new, untrammeled land, and are the very
essence of the sheep credo: They go nowhere alone. Rather, they
travel in yammering packs of a dozen or more.
Having said
this, I find encouragement in your words. Perhaps if responsible
bikers such as yourself tell your side of the story as you so ably
did in your article, common ground can be found. It would be best
to strike a compromise, and this compromise must include
eradication of this sorry lot of irresponsible bikers from our
public lands. If those who remain will pursue their sport in a
conscientious and responsible manner, motorized vehicle enthusiasts
should be able to enjoy pursuit of their sport alongside others who
enjoy their own recreational activities.
Steve
Pellegrini
Yerington, Nevada
This article appeared in the print edition of the magazine with the headline Common ground in the ORV debate.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
