Environmentalists aren’t the only ones
opposed to mining in the wilderness. Citing
“quality of life” concerns, more than 50 business
owners in Sandpoint, Idaho, officially opposed the Forest
Service’s plan to allow a copper mine beneath Montana’s
Cabinet Mountains Wilderness Area (HCN, 2/18/02: Battle brews over
a wilderness mother lode). The downstream businesses include an
insurance company, a furniture store and a development
company.
Environmentalists were
optimistic last year when Wyoming elected its first
Democratic governor in eight years. But Gov. Dave Freudenthal has
jumped on the coalbed methane bandwagon (HCN, 2/17/03: Wyoming at a
crossroads). In a July letter to Federal Reserve board chairman
Alan Greenspan, the governor complained that the Bureau of Land
Management was taking too long to complete environmental studies
related to methane drilling in the Powder River Basin, and thereby
causing production declines.
Is the Fish
and Wildlife Service giving up on itself? For the past 30
years, the agency has enforced the Endangered Species Act by
evaluating whether the actions proposed by other agencies harm rare
species (HCN, 6/23/03: Sound science goes sour). But under a new
rule, agencies will police themselves instead. In July, Fish and
Wildlife and the National Marine Fisheries Service proposed that
land-management agencies do their own endangered species
consultation for projects involving “wildfire
prevention.”
The Columbia River:
It’s big, it’s wide, but it’s still not any
deeper. The Army Corps of Engineers’ plan to dredge
and deepen the Columbia’s shipping channel has been delayed
again, this time by the state of Washington (HCN, 6/24/02: Columbia
dredging closer). The state’s Pollution Control Hearings
Board has issued a stay preventing the Department of Ecology from
approving the plan until the agency reviews its policy toward beach
erosion and sediment placement.
This article appeared in the print edition of the magazine with the headline Follow-up.

