When developer Tom Chapman made millions on western
Colorado land the Forest Service appraised at just $640,000, agency
land exchange specialist Paul Zimmerman admitted, “We may well have
missed on this one” (HCN, 1/23/95). Now, residents of Crested
Butte, Colo., say the agency didn’t learn much from the
experience.
“It’s totally bass ackwards,” says
Sandy Shea, public-lands coordinator for the environmental group
High Country Citizens’ Alliance, about a deal that would turn more
than 500 acres of national forest land over to Crested Butte
Mountain Resort. In return, the resort has agreed to buy private
inholdings and patented mining claims and transfer them to the
Forest Service. It will also buy a Gunnison County ranch and
transfer it to the state of Colorado, which will turn more land
over to the Forest Service. The deal would cost the resort $5
million.
But Shea insists the land the resort is
after is worth $20 million. The Forest Service appraisal assumed
that the resort could divide the land into 12 home sites, yet it is
common knowledge, says Shea, that the resort plans to annex the
land and develop up to 350 homes. Now his group, along with the
town of Crested Butte, the nearby Rocky Mountain Biological
Laboratory and two individuals, has appealed the
deal.
Crested Butte Mountain Resort president
Edward Callaway insists it is a fair price. “Chapman – that’s not
who we are. We’re much more community-minded,” he says. He
acknowledges the resort wants to annex the land but says annexation
is iffy and expensive.
Speculation that Crested
Butte Mountain Resort will annex and develop the land it gets from
the Forest Service is not enough to make it more valuable, agrees
John Byars, a Forest Service lands and minerals specialist. “We
have to appraise the land as it sits today.”
Forest Service officials in Washington, D.C.,
should rule on the appeals by early October.
*
Greg Hanscom
This article appeared in the print edition of the magazine with the headline Proposed land trade riles Crested Butte.

