Tim DeChristopher won’t be allowed to put global warming on trial when he’s on trial.
DeChristopher majors in economics at the University of Utah. Last fall, he went into a BLM auction and successfully bid on 13 drilling leases, also driving up prices for other successful bidders. But he didn’t have the $1.7 million to pay for the leases — he didn’t even have the intention to pay. In April, he was charged with felonies like interfering with a government auction and making a false representation.
In recent preliminary maneuvering before the trial, DeChristopher tried to raise the “necessity defense” of choosing the lesser of two evils.
That is, committing one crime was the only way to prevent a greater crime. One oft-cited example comes from the movie “North by Northwest,” where the crime of drunken driving was allowed because it was the only way to prevent the greater crime of kidnapping. It also appeared in a recent episode of “Law & Order,” wherein the defendant claimed that the murder of a doctor was the only way to prevent more abortions, which were murders in the defendant’s eyes.
DeChristopher argued that sabotaging the BLM auction prevented more drilling which would have led to more global warming. If the judge accepted that, then the defense could call climate experts during the trial.
Federal Judge Dee Benson ruled against the necessity defense because DeChristopher had other options besides his false bids. He could have filed a formal protest on the leases, demonstrated outside the auction, or joined the environmental groups who sued and kept the leases from proceeding.
In other words, even if the court conceded that global warming was a greater offense than some false bids, DeChristopher had other means at his disposal to oppose that greater offense.
No trial date has been set. If convicted, DeChristopher could get up to 10 years in prison, although the prosecutor, Brett Tolman, said such a long sentence was unlikely.
Although I enjoyed the “monkey wrench” aspect of DeChristoper’s actions, I have to say the judge’s ruling seemed sound to me. I don’t want someone disabling my pickup, then successfully pleading that the vandalism was necessary to deter global warming.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
