Ten simple words.
For the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde in western
Oregon, ten words introduced into an existing law would restore their relationship with the land upon which their
ancestors lived. Other tribes, however, consider
the move risky.
Last month, Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) introduced a bill in
Congress that would add the Grand Ronde to the list of four tribal groups who
currently have treaty and consulting rights in the Columbia River Gorge area under the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act of 1986. The Grand Ronde tribes, who were forcibly removed from their homeland along the Columbia
River in 1855-56, were busy fighting for federal recognition and a reservation
when the law was passed.
“It’s a matter of simple justice,” says Siobhan Taylor,
public affairs director for the Grand Ronde. “When Lewis and Clark came to the
area they mention meeting speakers of the Chinook languages … descendants of
those speakers are members of the tribe today.”
As part of the act, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs,
the Confederated Tribes of Umatilla, the Nez Perce and the Yakama Nation are allowed to partake in cultural ceremonies around the Gorge and are regularly consulted on environmental matters. If human remains are found in the area, those tribes
are sought out in case the remains belonged to an ancestor who should be
properly buried.
All four of those tribal groups oppose the inclusion of the
Grand Ronde tribes into the Columbia Gorge act.
“You cannot open the door just a little ways, and have just
the inclusion of another tribe,” said Louie Pitt, director of government
affairs for the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, in an Aug. 13 article in
the Spilyay Tymoo. Including any special
interest could dilute the rights and management responsibilities of the
existing tribes, he said.
The hostility between the tribal groups might have something
to do with Grand Ronde’s formal opposition to the proposed Warm Springs casino
in Cascade Locks (the Grand Ronde have their own casino). Or perhaps the law’s
existing tribal members fear their fishing rights will be threatened.
The issue is reminiscent of the feuds between tribes in
Washington, some of which oppose the Duwamish’s fight for federal recognition.
“A long time ago, you could travel anywhere in any
reservation and you’d be welcome,” says Cecile Hansen, a Duwamish tribal leader
and descendant of Chief Sealth, Seattle’s namesake. “Mom always made dinner on
Sunday from scratch, and there was always some Indian people from some place
who would show up. And now it’s not that way … That’s an unspoken truth.”
The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde aren’t asking for
anything other than to be recognized, Taylor says, and if anything the tribes
should really be supporting each other.
“The Grand Ronde is a Columbia River tribe and we see no
reason why we shouldn’t get the same voice,” she says. “I don’t know what
[those other tribes] are thinking.”
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
